Damn it, why is this post so hard to write? I’ve been umming and ahhing over it for the last week – all the previous incarnations have either been to long-winded and boring, or too glib. A word of warning, I will be quoting extensively from the book I’m writing about, because sometimes the author does a better job than I could of hanging himself. Let’s begin.
The pain-body consists of trapped life-energy that has split off from your total energy field and has temporarily become autonomous through the unnatural process of mind identification.
This cryptic sentence comes from Eckhart Tolle’s The Power of Now, a self-help book published in 1999, which has been enjoying a surge in popularity because of Tolle’s endorsement from that queen of spiritual window shopping, Oprah. It is typical of the loop-the-loop style of Tolle’s writing, but more of that later.
I thought, when I borrowed this book from the library, that I would be angered by Tolle’s writing. I was expecting him to have written things that I could pounce on as being dangerous. There were a few flashes of anger as I read, but mostly, I found 191 pages of badly written half-baked philosophical meandering.
The “Publishers Preface” sets up grand expectations:
Perhaps once in a decade, or even once in a generation, a book like The Power of Now comes along. It is more than a book; there is living energy in it, one that you can probably feel as you hold it… From the first page of his writing, it is clear that Eckhart Tolle is a contemporary master.
Tolle obviously believes those grand statements, as he writes in his introduction:
The pause symbol (S) after certain passages is a suggestion that you may want to stop reading for a moment, become still, and feel and experience the truth of what has just been said.
I’m getting ahead of myself, though. Let’s start with the first bit of writing in the book – a quotation facing the copyright page:
You are here to enable the divine purpose of the universe to unfold. That is how important you are!
Not the pithiest thing I’ve ever read… but who wrote these words? Jesus? the Buddha? Plato? No! Eckhart Tolle starts his book with a crap quotation from: himself!
It would be too easy (and a little tedious) to nitpick every page in the book, so I’m going to pull out a few themes around which the book is built.
Theme #1: Science, BAD. But scientists are now proving that prayer works/’higher dimensions’ exist/quantum teleportation is the same as magic.
This is a common theme with spiritual/religious folk, who disparage science and at the same time try to couch their claims in scientific language to make them seem more legitimate. When creationists felt they could no longer influence the public school system with arguments based purely on faith, they came up with Intelligent Design, which is creationism shrouded in scientific-sounding language. The person who wrote the Foreword to The Power of Now (Russell E. Dicarlo, if that means something to you) is disdainful of science:
Materialistically bound, traditional science assumes that anything that cannot be measured, tested in a laboratory, or probed by the five senses or their technological extensions simply doesn’t exist. It’s “not real”…Spiritual, or what I call nonphysical, dimensions of reality have been run out of town.
Not run out of town fast enough, which is why this book exists. But I digress. Dicarlo then says that despite the pooh-poohing of ‘traditional’ scientists, science is starting to show that there is something ‘out there’, as spiritualists have always claimed:
Interestingly enough, [an] extended, multidimensional model of reality is suggested by quantum theorists such as Jack Scarfetti who describes superluminal travel… Or consider the work of the legendary physicist, David Bohm, with his explicate (physical) and implicate (non-physical) multidimensional model of reality.
Who the hell is Jack Scarfetti? I’m pretty sure he means Jack SARFATTI – the same Sarfatti who once professed to be impressed by Uri Geller’s ‘telekinetic’ ability, and was one of the founders of the Physics Consciousness Research Group. Go have a look at their website, while I duck to avoid the accusations of using an ad hominem argument. Seriously, go look at it. You’ll learn something. Mainly, you’ll learn all about how not to design a website.
I’m still not sure whether the Scarfetti-Sarfatti thing was a typo (pretty big one), or whether Dicarlo was hoping that people would take his impressive-sounding words at face value without doing further research (well, if he names his reference, it must be true). It’s bad form, regardless.
Theme #2: Thinking, BAD.
Thinking has become a disease
Tolle says that all our problems exist because we identify too much with our minds. The quotation above is only the most succinct of the anti-intellectual statements in The Power of Now.
Tolle calls the thinking mind the ‘egoic mind’. This egoic mind is where all our thoughts and emotions occur, and because thoughts and emotions often relate to memory of the past or anticipation of the future, Tolle says we are never able to truly exist in the present (or the ‘Now’) if we identify with it.
This is not a new idea. The obvious connection is with Buddhism, and more recently, some varieties of existentialism. Schopenhauer wrote about existence and the nature of time in his essay, The Emptiness of Existence:
What has been exists no more; and exists just as little as that which has never been. But everything that exists has been in the next moment. Hence something belonging to the present, however unimportant it may be, is superior to something important belonging to the past; this is because the former is a reality and related to the latter as something is to nothing.
Tolle knows that he is borrowing piecemeal from different philosophies, and using their terminology in an idiosyncratic manner. He defends himself by being patronising:
The mind always wants to categorize and compare, but this book will work better for you if you do not attempt to compare its terminology with that of other teachings; otherwise, you will probably become confused.
Aw, thanks for the warning Eckhart. So if we don’t understand something, it’s because we aren’t trying hard enough?
You haven’t yet grasped the essence of what I am saying because you are trying to understand it mentally. The mind cannot understand this. Only you can. Please just listen.
That’s just a wordier version of the old cop-out, “‘Cos I said so. Ner.”
Theme #3: The body, and whether it is a good thing (the jury’s still out on that one)
Tolle writes that the way to happiness/enlightenment/insert another grand word here is to be present in one’s body. To be present in your body requires you to watch yourself, and be conscious of your breathing, your thoughts, and your emotions. There’s nothing wrong with this sentiment, I think, apart from the ‘enlightenment’ part. There is a calmness which comes with being introverted for a moment and observing yourself.
It seems Tolle is not a spiritualist of the common body-hating variety. He doesn’t buy into the whole body-spirit dichotomy. That’s a good thing. But just as you are starting to empathise with him, he reveals that he does buy into the old, completely erroneous, human-animal dichotomy:
On the level of the body, humans are very close to animals.
Say what?
All the basic bodily functions – pleasure, pain, breathing, eating, drinking, defecating, sleeping, the drive to find a mate and procreate, and of course birth and death – we share with the animals.
You know what I said about him not being body-hating? Scratch that:
When you become identified more with the inner body than with the outer body… you do not accumulate time any more in your psyche and in the cells of your body… So if you inhabit the inner body, the outer body will grow old at a much slower rate.
Is there any scientific evidence for this?
Try it out and you will be the evidence.
Yeah, um. ‘K.
I said at the start of this post that Tolle’s writings caused a few flashes of anger. The quotations above made me cringe, but I still wasn’t feeling real anger. Then, this happened:
Generally speaking, it is easier for a woman to feel and be in her body.
and:
To go beyond the mind and reconnect with the deeper reality of Being, [the qualities needed are] surrender, nonjudgement, an openness that allows life to be instead of resisting it, the capacity to hold all things in the loving embrace of your knowing. All these qualities are much more closely related to the female principle.
I can see Oprah and her fans eating this ‘female principle’ crap right up. But these ideas are not new, not original, not revelations of Tolle’s. The whole male-mind, female-body association has been around for, like, EVER. I’m amazed to see people buying into it in the 21st Century.
But buy they do. Tolle’s books used to be reading material for ex- and wannabe hippies. Now, thanks to Oprah and her goddamn bookclub, his works are being displayed prominently in mainstream bookstores, reaching people who might need real help but will be content, at least for some time, to try out his easy answers and make him rich. 3.5 million copies of Tolle’s latest book, A New Earth, were sold in the month following Oprah’s announcement of its inclusion in her Bookclub.
Getting back to the body and women’s bodies in particular, Tolle has this to say (it’s a long one, but I promise it’s worth it):
The pain-body usually has a collective as well as personal aspect. The personal aspect is the accumulated residue of emotional pain suffered in one’s past. The collective one is the pain accumulated in the collective human psyche over thousands of years through disease, torture, war, murder, cruelty, madness, and so on… Apart from her personal pain-body, every woman has her share in what could be described as the collective female pain-body… The emotional or physical pain that for many women precedes and coincides with the menstrual flow is the pain-body in its collective aspect that awakens from its dormancy at that time… it restricts the free flow of life energy through the body, of which menstruation is a physical expression.
Oh, menstruation is the flow of life energy through the body! Pesky biology teachers forgot to mention! And another question – how does the collective pain-body of men, with all the years of war, famine, disease, etc., manifest itself? Or can it be that Tolle has latched on to something he knows nothing about, and is making completely baseless proclamations? Can it ever. Grr. I have to admit I was suffering from a particularly nasty bout of PMS while I read this book, but I promise my collective pain-body has nothing to do with my disdain for it.
Theme #4: There is nothing more important than personal enlightenment.
Tolle says that the minutiae of day-to-day life like paying bills, going to work, eating and sleeping are meaningless if you are not present in the ‘Now’. This is a clever tactic, although once again, not unique to Tolle – the established religions have been using it for yonks. People don’t want to feel that their lives, or the lives of those they love, are meaningless. So true believers will do all they can to promote Tolle’s philosophies (and books, CDs, etc) to their families and friends. It’s the same as devout but misguided Christians preaching to their friends because they don’t want them to go to hell.
For all his talk of peace and happiness, Tolle also offers an ‘out’ for those people who might be feeling guilty about being self-obessesed and not actually doing anything to help make the world a more peaceful place:
Empathy with someone else’s pain or lack and a desire to help need to be balanced with a deeper realization of the eternal nature of all life and the ultimate illusion of all pain… This also applies if you are supporting a movement designed to stop deeply unconscious humans from destroying themselves.
Tolle apparently thinks there are no such things as innocent victims. They are ‘unconscious’ and ‘destroying themselves’, which makes it ok to ignore them in the quest for your own enlightenment.
Remember: Just as you cannot fight the darkness, so you cannot fight unconsciousness. If you try to do so, the polar opposites will become strengthened and more deeply entrenched… you will create an “enemy”, and so be drawn into unconsciousness yourself. Raise awareness by disseminating information, or at the most, practise passive resistance.
Weak. Unimpressive.
I have probably been in the target demographic for this kind of self-help book in the last few months: middle-class, frustrated at my job, wanting to do something meaningful with my life, and although I wish this wasn’t a factor, female. Even in this somewhat vulnerable state, I found Tolle to be unconvincing. He gives no real answers – he just skims other people’s ideas and regurgitates superficial thought-bytes.
Oprah must be a really confused person, to fall for this.
I will be reading A New Earth when I finally get my hands on it, and will report back. It’s an indication of how many people Tolle is reaching that I’m 23th on the waiting list for it at my library.
Here’s hoping most of them find his work as uninspired as I do.



June 5, 2008 at 11:42 am |
I really don’t know how you survived reading that…
Brain of steel, that must be it. Brain of steel.
June 5, 2008 at 11:53 am |
Nooo! You’ve just given away my secret superhero identity!
June 14, 2008 at 12:13 am |
[...] by bloggyfriends like The Outer Hoard, Naon Tiotami’s entry on creationism and …. er, and And Say We Did on ‘The Power of [...]
June 14, 2008 at 12:26 am |
The problem is that it is getting worse. The few (tens of) thousands who read your blog and think critically compared to the millions who are reading it and saying “that sounds about right” – its like trying to hold back the flood with a water-bucket.
July 18, 2008 at 5:17 am |
You say that Oprah must be confused to fall for this. Is it even within your realm of possibility that perhaps it is you that are confused? Or, if not confused, that your ego self is threatened by this.
Someone once said that people fear what they do not understand, and what they fear they destroy. I would add that if they cannot destroy it, they ridicule it in the hope of getting converts and creating a safety of numbers, thereby easing their own fear.
Your snide responses are exactly the what The Power of Now means by being so identified with the thinking mind, the ego self, that one is incapable of seeing the authentic self that lies beyond that.
Fearful people may continue in control. Personally I don’t think the planet will be a very good place to live if they do (if it’s livable at all). But there is a growing number of people who are awakening from the dream of the ego self. Check out what they have to say as well. Here are some recommendations: Byron Katie, Leonard Jacobson, Adyashanti, Jan Frazier, Gina Lake, Tony Persons, Bob Adams, Gangaji…. Are you getting the picture here? This is only a partial list of just the ones that I know about. Tolle isn’t a get rich quick self help guru and neither are these others.
There is something profound and wonderful happening here. But you must go beyone fear to see. How you live is your choice. But please don’t condemn people whose teachings you do not grasp. Just say you don’t see what the fuss is about and move on. They would not belittle you for your response. Please consider doing them the same kindness.
July 18, 2008 at 11:16 am |
You know your blog is getting good traffic when the patronising, deluded folks who claim to be oh-so-open-minded come out to tell you that you should stop challenging the way they think.
Wakar, your comment made me so angry that I don’t even know where to begin (much like I felt when I read Tolle’s ‘writing’). But let me try:
You give me two options in your first paragraph, as reasons for not liking Tolle’s book: that I am confused, or that my ‘ego self’ is threatened. I have to admit I WAS tremendously confused, but only after reading Tolle’s bad writing and worse thinking. In my usual state, I am pretty sure of what I think and what it would take for me to change my mind (ie., real evidence, not vague meanderings from a hippie relic). As for my tautological ‘ego self’ – I don’t feel threatened by Tolle and his thinking because I find it childish, simplistic, and just plain misguided. I do feel threatened by what seems to be thousands of fairly well-off people who could be doing something useful for the world, spending their money on crap self-help books which tell them that their inner lives/higher selves/blahblahblah are the most important thing. How self-obsessed can you get?
Your second paragraph is reminiscent of Tolle’s borrowing from philosophy/religions before him without giving due credit. I think you’ll find that quote you mentioned comes from the bible. In any case, it is a completely inappropriate quote because those of us who ridicule Tolle are not doing it because we don’t ‘understand’ him (although he tries his best to be incomprehensible with his afore mentioned bad writing and sloppy thinking), or because we ‘fear’ what he has to say. We ridicule him because we are well-read and we realise that he is borrowing piecemeal from various religions and philosophies, and doing so in a very superficial manner. We ridicule him because he has become powerful, just by expounding this dumbed-down version of real thought, which people who don’t like to think lap up like thirsty puppies.
I am snide, I can’t argue with that. But I enjoy being snide. I enjoy playing with words and thoughts, and I enjoy having a mind. I love identifying myself with my mind, because the human mind is an amazing thing. Thankfully those others in the world who love their minds and love using their minds will continue to mock Tolle, because otherwise human existence would be a self-hating, ineffectual, mindless morass. THAT’s the kind of world that would be unlivable.
I had a quick look at the ’spiritual teachers’ you mentioned. I’m sorry, I don’t consider that evidence, and you’re not going to win me over to your way of thinking by just providing a list of other deluded people. If you, or any of these people want to provide me with copies of their work, I’d be happy to read it. But I have better things to spend my money on, and better humans to support with it.
There is plenty in the world that is profound and wonderful: watching a meteor shower, seeing the ocean underwater while scuba diving, watching talented musicians play, or even just sharing a laugh with other people. The ’spiritual teachers’ you mentioned and their spewings are NOT profound (on the contrary, they are extremely superficial) or wonderful (they are not full of wonder at all, but rather, self-hatred and hatred for the real world).
How I live IS my choice, and I don’t need you to tell me that, thanks very much. How you live is also your choice, but it is part of my life to condemn the bad things I see in the world, and I am not going to censor myself simply because you’ve chosen to include those things in your life.
You’ve made an essential error by saying that I don’t ‘grasp’ Tolle’s teachings. I grasp them perfectly well. There’s just not a lot there TO grasp. If you think what he says is all true and correct, then of course you’re going to think that I’m missing something. I don’t often say this, but in this case, you’re just wrong.
I don’t see what the fuss is about – and I thought that’s exactly what I was saying in this blog post.
You say “they would not belittle you for your response”. Calling someone ’snide’, ‘confused’, ‘threatened’, and suggesting they are destructive and fearful – you don’t consider that belittling? I shudder to consider what your idea of an insult is.
July 23, 2008 at 4:43 pm |
Where there is grace, there is NO race…
May 30, 2009 at 1:12 pm |
Thanks for your criticle stance with this D-Bag.
I dislike Tolle and his teachings beacause he tells people basicly that “Your ego is running the show and that is not good, and beacause of that you need to do something about it”
I would rather be an ego driven maniac than surcumb to his retarded philosiphys
Why antagonize the ego??? it is a function of our being is it not? It just a term that spiritualists stole from Freud to use, to create a conversation. Just like religions need the oppisit of good like “The Devil” to spark fear, Tolle needs the ego to spark the fear of not being in control. Ego is not the source of your unhappyness, I dont get it. Really. I dont know what is going on, but I know enough to know that Tolle is full of crap.
I’m not going to say he is completly without merit, and I appreitiate dudes like him cause he instigates discussion and alternatives to convention. Some of his practices I am sure have merit, and have been usfull to me for furthering my comprehention of things.
But even if I’m totally wrong about him and he’s totally right, and that may be so, the guys still as boring as hell, and no fun!!! seiriously have you ever herd him talk? I just want to murder myself. I’d rather hang out with a couple Meth atics, cause at least they would be interesting, instead of sit there and tell me that my brain is the source of all my discomfort and I should learn to get rid of it.
July 23, 2008 at 4:46 pm |
Joe – uh-huh. And?
August 13, 2008 at 2:57 pm |
hey Brain of Steel!
i came back to this blog ’cause Ali got an eckhart tolle book for a birthday present and i didn’t know what to say to her about it (without reading it myself of course) i just vaguely remembered some scathing (and highly amusing – yes i have a strange sense of humour) rant about it.
unfortunately now i realise it’s not the same book, have you read “a new earth” yet? i need some ammunition!
hope you’re feeling better
cheers
mark
August 13, 2008 at 3:08 pm |
I haven’t read “A New Earth” yet – I’m still on the waiting list at the library! Sorry
Maybe you can read it for me, and write something here about it as a guest blogger… it’ll save me from buying paper towels to mop up the brain-bleed, in any case.
August 15, 2008 at 9:23 am |
Hey, I just stumbled upon this website and its pretty cool.. I don’t know who the author “Eckhart tolle” is but, his quotes are most impressive, i don’t know what the other person who keeps interrupting in the middle is trying to prove.. hmm.. i think i’ll go buy his book.. thnx!
August 15, 2008 at 10:07 am |
Dapassion8: thanks for your well-thought-out and meaningful comment. I’m sure you and Eckhart will be very happy together.
September 4, 2008 at 3:51 pm |
So, I was looking for some criticism on Eckhart Tolle, and stumbled across this blog. Thank you, by the way, for wading through the entire book to provide a helpful critique for those of us who couldn’t get past the first chapter.
Incidentally, the phrase “i hate eckhart tolle” only gets about half a dozen hits. Likewise, “eckhart tolle sucks” just gets one. It seems to me that the dearth of criticism for something so well read and practically unintelligible is a little concerning. Is there something in the water?
September 4, 2008 at 4:18 pm |
Thanks for your comment, Cheryl – I get a perverse pleasure from reading this tripe, especially when it seems to be so pervasive and influential.
There is criticism of Tolle out there, but is swamped by the pro-Tolle content. I don’t think there are many skeptics (or folks of a skeptical bent who might not want to be labelled ’skeptics’) who have spoken about Tolle and his writing in particular, which is why I’ve decided to tackle it.
It’s difficult to argue individually against every purveyor of New Age nonsense, but I think Oprah’s endorsement has placed Tolle in a unique position. There are plenty of New Age merchants catering to those who are searching for that kind of thing, but Tolle’s writing has reached a much wider audience thanks to Oprah, which makes him much more dangerous than the others.
I recently borrowed Tolle’s ‘A New Earth’ from my library, so stay tuned for a report on that one!
September 25, 2008 at 9:57 am |
Well, you’ve got a buddy! I hate Eckhart Tolle, too!!!
October 12, 2008 at 1:46 pm |
Ahhhhhh……………The search is over. Scouring this dung pile of an internet for a non theist critique of Egghead Tool has been an opression, yet on I plodded until arriving here in the presence of rationality.
At thanksgiving dinner tonight, ( Canadian), I sat amongst a gaggle of Tolle adherents, who extoled the virtues of the aforemetioned bozo’s plagiarisms
( hmmm….no bibliography included)
I spoke but once at the table, and realized there was no frickin way I could interject logical reason.
I am now on a beer induced mission to educate myself non theistically of available critiques on the perpetuator of self help
October 12, 2008 at 1:54 pm |
Ahhhhhh……………The search is over. Scouring this dung pile of an internet for a non theist critique of Egghead Tool has been an opression, yet on I plodded until arriving here in the presence of rationality.
At thanksgiving dinner tonight, ( Canadian), I sat amongst a gaggle of Tolle adherents, who extoled the virtues of the aforemetioned bozo’s plagiarisms
( hmmm….no bibliography included)
I spoke but once at the table, and realized there was no frickin way I could interject logical reason.
I am now on a beer induced mission to educate myself non theistically with available critiques on the perpetuator of self help $$$$$$$.
Thank you for having the good blue collar fuck you sense approach to dismissing this moron from the ranks of respectability, and of course, for allowing me to see that I am alone here in Canada fighting the good fight.
On the topic of egos: his ego is in good working order to manage his $$$ business affairs.
I shall now return to writing an objection to Critique on Pure Reason
Doug Miller………hic…………
October 12, 2008 at 1:56 pm |
…………hic……………….oops!
October 27, 2008 at 11:47 am |
I just read one person’s account of attending a Tolle lecture in 2003, in which he mentioned that he and the other 1200 people in attendance paid $75 each for admission. Now multiply 75 times 1200. The income from this single lecture was $90,000. You’ve just learned everything you need to know about Tolle.
November 19, 2008 at 1:02 am |
afer enjoying Richard Rohr for a while, I came across this reference to Ekhardt Tolle, who had the same imapct on me as you so rationally and lightly (irreverently -and that’s ok) critique:
http://www.cacradicalgrace.org/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=CFAAC&Product_Code=SP-C-09&Category_Code=MRM&Product_Count=11
You have discovered some of the closed system built into cultish, codependent “reasoning”, which is a thickly disguised double negative: denying the reality of the hard facts of “commonsense” – that tragedy and trauma, loss and death are terrible goads to live the provoked life, not to seek solace in pseudo-intellectual pap. Well, perhaps from someone for whom Tolle is the first teacher in transpersonal states that can bless the relaxation response, it is tempting to bless him as a liberator.
Although I have a weakness for the poetics of the Christain tradition, particularly in some of its more pro-social and pro-biosphere emergent styles, I also have a pro-social skepticism which spices up what i am quite happy to call my “faith journey”. Did you read Wendy Kaminers little book, which also grieves over the loss of many good souls to history by their retreat into quietism and worse: she titles her book “Sleeping WithExtraterrestials: The Perils aof Piety and the rise of the new irrationalism”. She finds Depak Chopra etc etc are all mutually referential mish-mashes and symptomatic of declining enlightenment values, which do not devalue intuition and imagination just because it treasures the methods of reason in all speres of life. Someone should do a study of the audiences of gurus like Mr Tolle – now THAT would be interesting., much more interesting than wading through Tolles rather unhinged discorses. And it can and ought to be coming from the very heart of compassion. Life is an awe-filled Mystery. Tolle is not, thanks to you.
December 7, 2008 at 10:11 pm |
He prefaces A New Earth by saying that it would be a book of profound transformation or meaningless. I find this holds true with all religious and spiritual texts, not just his books. But regardless of it being the “ultimate truth” or not, I really don’t see how something that promotes and shows how to achieve ultimate inner and outer peace and love (which, if you read into these books, they do) would not be worthwhile.
The fact that the book is repetitive (he even SAYS it is in the book!) and borrows from other religions is no mystery or unknown, even by “followers”. The central message (and ultimate truth) of the book is that you ultimately need no idea, thought, or belief to allow you to be enlightened; that enlightenment is never achieved by THINKING, but by being experienced. (note: *IF* something was pointing to the ‘ultimate’ truth, wouldn’t it share something in common with other things that do the same? It’s not like Buddhisms enlightenment COULD be any different than Tolle’s)
He describes an experience, and ultimately unless a person experiences this “presence”, even briefly, the book will be another bundle of ideas to be agreed with or not… Once you experience true presence, you then don’t ‘believe’ Tolle, you use these words to achieve that state of enlightened existence. (Oddly enough, it is easy to “forget” the feeling; which is you again identifying with the mind in some way)
As I read the end of the first chapter in “A New Earth” I had an awakening in the form of intense awareness and blissful peace.. So I never had a chance to “dispute” his statements, because as I finished reading the first chapter this “presence” became real for me.
/shrug As I read everything else he wrote, and it all made perfect sense because that experience testified for it’s truth; unfortunately, this experience is needed for his teachings to have any true transformative value. For me, now, everything he says seems so completely logical and glaringly obvious that I find it a wonder that some people can’t see this!
I mean, isn’t it obvious through self-observing that the mind constantly projects a future or past? Aren’t people oftentimes “lost in thought” and consequently aren’t very aware of what is going on around them? They then “snap back to reality” and become again more aware of where they are at, etc. Anyway, regardless of whether you believe this enlightenment mumbo jumbo; learning to be more aware of your surroundings, emotions, and thoughts is always a good thing.
December 15, 2008 at 12:29 pm |
Isn’t it patently obvious that there is no ‘mind-less’ observation of mind?
Isn’t it obvious that it is impossible, through reading (a verbal activity of the mind), to escape the power of language and symbolization?
Just how disenchanted have our daily routines become that we actually need someone to sell books telling us that enchantment can be a useful ‘mind-mode’?
December 22, 2008 at 7:45 pm |
I am pretty sure that the jist of the book is clear that it is the ego vs true self battle that is in our best interest to first see then side with that which serves the later.
If just this one application were realized we would likely live in a much more productive world. A by productive I don’t mean the accumalation of more stuff but shift in awareness to that place we have all had a glimpse of from time to time.
Blogs could actually consisit of efforts to bring each other up that trying so hard to tear each other down. No one should expect that any one human will write a book of perfection to satisfy every critic. This book did help me to recongnize the damage to inner peace that the ego ( yours and mine ) ultimately destroys. The spirit of the book was more healing than the errors sought out or pointed out for the gratification of — ..well I’m sure you guessed it … THE EGO. It’s ironic how the Tao starts out with a preface of sorts that maybe Tolle should have stated more clearly than his ( those operating from a fully saturated ego presence .. won’t get it),,, That is The tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao The name that can be named is not the eternal Name.
peace
February 18, 2009 at 8:21 am |
Wow, andsaywedid! Thanks for writing this! I couldn’t agree more. I’d picked up “The Power of Now” several years ago. Couldn’t get through it! (Tried twice!) Then Oprah–bless her–chose “A New Earth”, and I decided to try again. 100 gazillion people can’t be wrong! Couldn’t even get through the first chapter. Point: I completely agree with your analysis.
My question: Have you written anything on Byron Katie? I have the same reaction to her–perhaps even moreso because I find her teachings to be not only insubstantial, but possibly dangerous. Nevertheless, I can find no intellectual criticque of her anywhere! Maybe she *is* as profound as all the hype says she is!
Waiting to hear…
March 1, 2009 at 5:32 pm |
for me having reached menopause and living with a chronic illness which effects the ability to think…….the bit about the female pain body just jumped out of the book and I suddenly stopped trying to read it
I went undiagnosed with my current illness and Ibelieve a part of that was my symptoms (physical) were worse premenstrually and as there was no validation of PMS as a medical condition, I thought that all I needed was psychological help and a new job
the concern about the danger of this book, I think is valid. Chris Northrup’s book on women’s health helped me to take my health problems more seriously and eventually I got diagnosed with a physical condition.
Chris Northrup was on Oprah as well and I do not agree with all her ideas. As a female doctor though, she explains how PMS got to be discounted for so long.
A bloke talking about PMS is probably always going to
trigger a pretty negative response from me…
March 16, 2009 at 8:00 am |
In his most recent book, it’s easy to Eckhart’s arguments as a war against the ego. There’s a perfection in the ego too, and seeing that perfection helps bring us to the present moment. In a war there’s no present moment, only attention on the conflict.
Polaris Rising
April 30, 2009 at 1:07 pm |
I had similar reactions to Tolle’s book, which a friend recommended… nay, insisted… that I read.
While I think Tolle’s writing can be very persuasive and inspiring for lay people with no real experience, I was enraged by the bad science and the sweeping generalizations. The part that got me was an analogy to planetary evolution, when suddenly all the plants started blooming at once – as if this happened overnight instead of gradually over millions of years. Gaah!
Tolle is pretty ignorant, and while his inner struggle was real and I think his insights are real, he doesn’t seem to have much background in science, theology, psychology, comparative religion, or pretty much anything outside of his own skull.
The original post here was snide, but I was right along with it.
FWIW I agree with much of what Tolle is saying, I just think he’s mistaking one tiny sliver of insight for the whole pie.
May 3, 2009 at 3:42 pm |
someone gave me this book as a gift and i wanted to like it because it was meaningful to him. i could not get through hardly any of it. red flags started going off in the intro when he was defending himself against his critics with what sounded very much like snide remarks. what kind of guru makes snide remarks?? anyway, it only got worse. i have to say i did question whether my ego was the problem, rather than ET. but the more i considered it, the more i became comfortable with writing him off as a total hack.
i think the danger lies in his flawed presentation of many spiritual ideas (in direct contradiction to, for example, the buddhist idea that people who don’t GET IT shouldn’t talk about the philosophy, because it just tangles everything up even more).
at the same time, if people take some comfort in reading his books, i’m not going to fault them for it. and hopefully he does something beneficial with the money he makes.
thanks again for your post!
May 28, 2009 at 5:58 pm |
Just read your article today. Thank you first of all for putting a smile on my face. I wanted to get some background for a book I’m writing about a 19th century mystic and thought I might look at Eckhart’s stuff for some inspiration. Unfortunately for him, I happened on your website first. Phew!!!
It does sound like a hodge podge of eastern mysticism and new age bollocks. I’ll go back to the original sources instead. Thanks for saving me a few hours.
Have you ever tried reading Ryuho Okawa’s Essence of Buddha? (name sounds like it should be a perfume).
I had to give up half-way through, it was not even annoying enough to keep me reading.
May 29, 2009 at 2:06 pm |
I read ‘A New Earth’ – didn’t agree with all he wrote – didn’t understand a lot of it. But the book has been helpful.
His discussions on ego opened my mind to my own ego – that can’t be bad.
Also the mental chatter stuff – I have endless thoughts running through my mind also – I didn’t realize they were so unproductive – which they are most of the time – at least for me. I’ve asked others if they have them too – they say they do.
Stopping to enjoy the moments. I haven’t done that very much before – but I’m doing it now – especially with the grandkids.
Stop thinking: I find it hard to shut down my mind. I can do it for maybe 30 seconds – then the chatter starts up again.
I haven’t been able to contact my spirit. I don’t know if that’s possible.
All in all it was worth reading – at least for me.
wellberr
May 30, 2009 at 11:13 pm |
After reading this post attacking Eckhart Tolle, it’s so obvious it’s coming from the egoic mind. Eckhart message is not hard at all. I wonder why you couldn’t grasp it at all. We all can see the ego that traps us in incessant thinking. We all have experienced suffering caused by the pain-body. The Power of Now is really such a clear, obvious and yet so powerful book. Rightly said, it’s a companion for a lifetime. Maybe you need to re-read it.
Or maybe you haven’t experienced enough suffering so far in life that it burns up your ego. Maybe someday, you’ll look back at what you wrote in your blog and awaken to the truth of your own over-analytical mind.
To everyone else, I’d just like to say… if you have any intuitive impulse to read The Power of Now., go ahead! You are ready to awaken.